Thursday, February 21, 2019

For Tuesday: Wells, William Shakespeare: A Very Short Introduction, Chs.3-5




Answer TWO of the following:


Q1: What did the First Folio preserve about Shakespeare’s legacy, and what did it confuse or mystify? Why does the context of the Folio remind us that we have to always read/interpret Shakespeare with a grain of salt (or a lot of close reading/research)?



Q2: Where does Wells seem to venture his own readings/interpretations about Shakespeare or his works? Where can we see the difference between factual statements about Shakespeare and his own suppositions? Does he always signpost the difference for us?



Q3: Wells notes that Shakespeare “was constantly experimenting with dramatic form and with the conventions of theatre” (50). Why would a playwright/actor whose business was to fill seats and make money being willing to take such risks? Which of the plays discussed in the book seems to do this most audaciously?



Q4: Reading about all his early comedies in a single chapter can give us a profound sense of déjà vu—or that we’re reading about virtually the same play. What themes or ideas seem to crop up the most in the early comedies? If Shakespeare has a unique theatrical thumbprint in his comedies, what might it be? In other words, how can we tell that The Two Gentlemen from Verona, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, and Twelfth Night are by the same author (according to what Wells tells us)?

No comments:

Post a Comment

For Thursday: King Lear, Acts 4-5 & In-Class Response (Paper #3!)

NOTE: See the revised course schedule below if you didn't get it in class on Tuesday, or lost it subsequently. We're changing a few ...